Ashley Benefield faced a murder trial this year where she offered emotional testimony about the abuse she suffered at the hands of her estranged husband before fatally shooting him in an act of self-defense. During the trial, the assistant state attorney questioned the authenticity of Ashley’s tears and had her re-enact the shooting for the jury to see up close, despite Ashley’s consistent breakdowns and authentic emotions throughout the proceedings.
While the jury acquitted Ashley of murder, she was convicted of manslaughter and faces up to 30 years in prison. Her lawyer argued that she only reported the alleged abuse to focus authorities’ attention on her husband’s behavior. The trial also highlighted a contentious custody battle between the couple, with prosecutors claiming Ashley fabricated abuse allegations and physical evidence not aligning with her self-defense claim.
Testifying in court, Ashley detailed instances of her husband’s controlling and volatile behavior, including threats, abuse towards their dog, and stalking. The judge in a previous custody hearing accused Ashley of turning on tears, awarded her husband immediate access to their child, and found no credible evidence of poisoning as she claimed.
The emotional and dramatic courtroom exchange where Ashley re-enacted the shooting as requested by the prosecutor, further fueled debates about the authenticity of her tears and the self-defense claim. Psychologist and therapist Barbara Russell, who treated Ashley, believed she was not deceptive and would not have shot her husband unless her life was truly in danger, criticizing prosecutors for portraying themselves as emotional expression experts. The case is at a standstill due to a request for a new trial based on juror misconduct.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
