Twenty-two state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration’s decision to limit research funding by slashing indirect costs paid to universities and research institutes. The National Institutes of Health announced a new policy limiting indirect funding to 15%, affecting equipment, maintenance, utilities, and support staff. The lawsuit claims violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and ignores Congress’ will, seeking a temporary restraining order against the new rule. Scientists have criticized the cuts as draconian and detrimental to research efforts on diseases and basic science. The University of California system stated that the changes could result in significant budget cuts, impacting personnel, services, education, and research. Proponents of the NIH shift argue that indirect costs are out-of-control overhead expenses. The lawsuit aims to prevent layoffs, disruptions to research programs, and negative impacts on scientific breakthroughs. The lawsuit also highlights the potential long-lasting impact on research infrastructure and capabilities, urging for a halt to the implementation of the new rules. The Department of Health and Human Services, to which the NIH directed inquiries, has not yet responded to the lawsuit.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
