Sheikh Hasina, once seen as a beacon of hope for democracy in Bangladesh, has faced increasing criticism for her autocratic tendencies during her time as prime minister. This backlash culminated in weeks of violent protests that led to her resignation on Monday. The New York Times’ South Asia bureau chief, Mujib Mashal, describes how Ms. Hasina fought fiercely to hold onto power until the very end.
Despite her initial promise as a leader who would bring about positive democratic reforms, Sheikh Hasina’s tenure as prime minister had become marred by allegations of corruption, cronyism, and stifling of dissent. Protests erupted across the country as citizens grew frustrated with her authoritarian rule, leading to escalating violence on the streets.
Ms. Hasina’s refusal to step down in the face of mounting pressure only fueled the flames of discontent among the population. The situation became increasingly volatile as clashes between protesters and government forces intensified, resulting in a dangerous and chaotic environment.
Ultimately, Sheikh Hasina was forced to resign from office amidst the escalating turmoil. Her departure marked a significant turning point in Bangladesh’s political landscape, with many hoping for a return to democratic principles and a more inclusive government.
As the dust settles following Ms. Hasina’s resignation, the future of Bangladesh remains uncertain. The challenges of rebuilding trust in the government and fostering a more inclusive society will undoubtedly be daunting tasks for those who come next. Time will tell whether the country can navigate this period of transition and emerge stronger on the other side.
Source
Photo credit www.nytimes.com